Clay Shirky has written a piece that is at once brilliant and devastating. In â€œNewspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable,â€ Shirky argues, as I have, that we must uncouple the fate of journalism from the fate of the newspaper business as we know it. Only then can we start building a future that is more diverse, more chaotic but probably also more rich than what we know now.
Hereâ€™s how Shirkey sums up (but do read the entire piece):
â€œSociety doesnâ€™t need newspapers. What we need is journalism. For a century, the imperatives to strengthen journalism and to strengthen newspapers have been so tightly wound as to be indistinguishable. Thatâ€™s been a fine accident to have, but when that accident stops, as it is stopping before our eyes, weâ€™re going to need lots of other ways to strengthen journalism instead.
â€œWhen we shift our attention from â€™save newspapersâ€™ to â€™save societyâ€™, the imperative changes from â€˜preserve the current institutionsâ€™ to â€˜do whatever works.â€™ And what works today isnâ€™t the same as what used to work.
â€œWe donâ€™t know who the Aldus Manutius of the current age is. It could be Craig Newmark, or Caterina Fake. It could be Martin Nisenholtz, or Emily Bell. It could be some 19 year old kid few of us have heard of, working on something we wonâ€™t recognize as vital until a decade hence. Any experiment, though, designed to provide new models for journalism is going to be an improvement over hiding from the real, especially in a year when, for many papers, the unthinkable future is already in the past.
â€œFor the next few decades, journalism will be made up of overlapping special cases. Many of these models will rely on amateurs as researchers and writers. Many of these models will rely on sponsorship or grants or endowments instead of revenues. Many of these models will rely on excitable 14 year olds distributing the results. Many of these models will fail. No one experiment is going to replace what we are now losing with the demise of news on paper, but over time, the collection of new experiments that do work might give us the reporting we need.â€